A Ten Step Plan To Repave Old San Juan

We need to repave Old San Juan. It’s over­due and the city is falling apart. We also need to con­vert Old San Juan into a pedes­tri­an city. So here’s a 10 step plan to do just that.

Photo of Orlando Mergal, A Ten Step Plan To Repave Old San Juan

Orlan­do Mergal

My name is Orlan­do Mer­gal. Think of me as a guy with a cam­era, a com­put­er and the Inter­net. I’ve been vis­it­ing Old San Juan since the ear­ly 70’s… and I’d like to see it repaved. Not in cheap con­crete bricks but in its orig­i­nal blue slag pavers. Old San Juan is the old­est city in Puer­to Rico and the third old­est in the West­ern Hemi­sphere. It’s also the old­est con­tin­u­ous­ly oper­at­ing city in the Unit­ed States and parts of it are rec­og­nized as a UNESCO World Her­itage Site. Oh, and did I men­tion that it’s beautiful?

Vis­it­ing Old San Juan is like step­ping back in his­to­ry. The archi­tec­ture, the streets and the old forts, the church­es all trans­port you to the 16th, 17th, 18th and 19th cen­turies. It’s like Dis­ney­land but with­out the ani­ma­tron­ics. It’s also full of restau­rants, bars and small hotels. It’s a cos­mopoli­tan city like no oth­er in America.

But vehic­u­lar traf­fic is killing Old San Juan. Some­how, in some twist­ed way, Puer­to Ricans picked up the notion that its fun to sit in a car —some­times for hours at a time— dri­ve over pot­holes in the blis­ter­ing trop­i­cal sun, and pol­lute every­thing around them. It’s sheer idio­cy if you ask me, but it hap­pens day in and day out.

Just think of it. Find­ing a park­ing spot in Old San Juan is mur­der, you can’t bring your car with you into restau­rants and muse­ums, so why dri­ve at all? Why not walk?

Res­i­dents have it a lit­tle eas­i­er. They can park on the streets. How­ev­er, being able to do some­thing and actu­al­ly get­ting to do it are two dif­fer­ent things. Most of the time they end up park­ing far from home and expos­ing their vehi­cles to poten­tial haz­ards. To avoid these per­ils many of them end up pay­ing for park­ing at one of sev­er­al pri­vate garages.

There are bet­ter ways to deal with these prob­lems and most of them aren’t new. This kind of prob­lem has plagued small cities in Europe for decades. And what they’ve found is that solv­ing it is a mat­ter of leav­ing child­ish atti­tudes behind and cre­at­ing the infra­struc­ture to make things happen.

The ideas that I’m about to pro­pose in this arti­cle aren’t new. Hell, most of them aren’t even mine. I’ve seen them all before in Europe and in the Unit­ed States. You prob­a­bly have too. And believe me, THEY WORK!!! Some peo­ple might con­sid­er them hair brain. But hey, I’m not an urban plan­ner. I’m just a con­cerned cit­i­zen. We’re destroy­ing Old San Juan!!! So if you don’t like my ideas, “NO PROBLEMO”. Feel free to bring up your own. Let’s dis­cuss them and repave Old San Juan.  And if your ideas are bet­ter we’ll use them. Let’s actu­al­ly solve a prob­lem.  Lets repave Old San Juan.

1. “Departamento De Hacienda”, a building in the wrong place

Puer­to Rico’s Trea­sury Depart­ment is locat­ed across the street from Pier 4 in Old San Juan. Why? In my view a Trea­sury Depart­ment is noth­ing but a giant account­ing office, so it could work just as well in Hato Rey (where there are plen­ty of under­uti­lized build­ings), at Metro Office Park or any­where else —for that mat­ter— where there’s ade­quate space, pow­er and data facil­i­ties. The only rea­son why “Hacien­da” is in Old San Juan is because that’s where it was when most of Puer­to Rico’s com­mer­cial ship­ping and whole­sal­ing oper­a­tions took place in Old San Juan. That was back in the 50’s and 60’s. This is 2024.

So step one would be mov­ing the Trea­sury Depart­ment some­where else, demol­ish­ing the build­ing and erect­ing a park­ing struc­ture large enough to accom­mo­date all the cars belong­ing to Old San Juan res­i­dents and tourists. The build­ing would need to be attrac­tive enough to sit in front of the tourism peers, although late­ly gov­ern­ment has been doing every­thing in its pow­er to scare off every imag­in­able cruise ship com­pa­ny (but that’s a sto­ry for anoth­er day). It would also need to be archi­tec­tural­ly com­pat­i­ble. Oth­er­wise it will stick out like a sore thumb!

2. Micro Buses, the only viable way to get around Old San Juan

Electric Microbus Used In Madrid, Spain

Elec­tric Microbus Used In Madrid, Spain. Click on image to see it larger.

The oth­er day an idiot tried to dri­ve a full-sized school bus down “Calle Del Sol” and “Cale­ta De Las Mon­jas”. Need­less to say, he made a fool of him­self, messed up the bus and destroyed a great amount of gov­ern­ment prop­er­ty. And who’ll pick up the tab? Prob­a­bly you and I.

Sim­ply put, Old San Juan wasn’t built for large vehi­cles. In fact, it wasn’t built for gas vehi­cles at all. Back in the 16th, 17th, 18th and 19th cen­turies peo­ple got around on foot, on horse­back or on horse drawn car­riages. That’s why the streets in Old San Juan are so nar­row and the hous­es have no garages.

Small Euro­pean cities have had sim­i­lar dilem­mas but they found a solu­tion. They call them “micro bus­es”, or at least that’s what they call them in Spain, where I saw them for the first time.

Once again, they’re noth­ing new. I rode the first one back in 1984. They’re sim­ply small vans like the ones used by car rental com­pa­nies to shut­tle tourists from and to the air­port. They’re also great to shut­tle res­i­dents from a cen­tral park­ing area to their des­ti­na­tion and back. Rid­ing these shut­tle bus­es is gen­er­al­ly free since any­one using them will be either a res­i­dent, a tourist or a vis­i­tor con­duct­ing some kind of busi­ness in the city.

Anoth­er option would be to make them free for res­i­dents car­ry­ing some sort of mag­net­ic card and charge a small fee to tourists and vis­i­tors. How­ev­er, that would make the sys­tem less attrac­tive for the lat­er groups.

Oklahoma City Street Car

Okla­homa City Street Car. Click on image to see it larger.

Last year I saw a shut­tle sys­tem like this in Okla­homa City. The shut­tles are a lit­tle larg­er, and they charge you a dol­lar for the ride, but they are sleek, mod­ern, and clean. Oh, and did I men­tion that the ones in Madrid run on bat­ter­ies? That’s right. No gas!

3. Slag Pavers, the best option to repave Old San Juan

Original Slag Pavers In Old San Juan

Orig­i­nal Slag Pavers In Old San Juan. Click on image to see it larger.

The orig­i­nal blue pavers found in Old San Juan today were import­ed from Eng­land start­ing in the late 19th Cen­tu­ry. They were made of slag, a stony waste mat­ter sep­a­rat­ed from met­als dur­ing the smelt­ing or refin­ing of ore. They were placed over a sand base and lat­er locked togeth­er with even more sand.

Through­out the years some have been paved over with black top and oth­ers were just removed alto­geth­er and thrown in San Juan Bay. It’s actu­al­ly a mir­a­cle that so many have sur­vived amid so many numb skull politicians.

To pro­duce slag you have to have met­al­lur­gy going on, and Puer­to Rico aban­doned this indus­try decades ago. But that doesn’t mean that it can’t be brought back for this spe­cif­ic pur­pose. God knows that we have more than enough scrap lay­ing around from past indus­tri­al exper­i­ments. Add to that the dev­as­ta­tion brought on by the past two hur­ri­canes, and the destruc­tion pro­duced by Jan­u­ary 2020’s earth­quakes, and you’d have plen­ty of raw mate­r­i­al. We also have plen­ty of capa­ble per­son­nel and emp­ty fac­to­ry space of every size and shape.

So why not start a local met­al­lur­gy oper­a­tion just to pro­duce slag pavers? I don’t know if this is even viable, or how much it would pol­lute, but it’s cer­tain­ly an idea worth explor­ing. If not, we could always have them made some­where else.

4. Money… without it we can’t repave Old San Juan

I was going to dis­cuss this aspect of the project last, but I can already hear the col­lec­tive yelling out there: “how is this guy propos­ing to pay for all this”? Well, here are a cou­ple of ideas. And, by the way, they aren’t new either. Have you ever been to Dis­ney World in Orlan­do? Have you seen the thou­sands of pavers that cov­er the square before enter­ing Main Street USA? Have you noticed that each and every one of those pavers is per­son­al­ized? That’s right!!! They all say some­thing like “The Rivera Fam­i­ly, 1988”.

Unfor­tu­nate­ly, the pavers used at Dis­ney World were made of tile, and they’re slow­ly falling apart, so Dis­ney man­age­ment has announced that they will soon be removed. But what if they were made of slag? Slag is actu­al­ly met­al that could be laser etched. It could also last way longer than tile if you don’t dri­ve motor vehi­cles over them.

I hon­est­ly have no idea how many pavers it would take to repave Old San Juan. That’s the kind of ques­tion that maybe my friend Dr. Fer­nan­do Abruña could answer. But let’s guess a num­ber. Let’s guess that it would take half a mil­lion (500,000). Maybe that’s too much or too lit­tle. Once again, I don’t know. But it’s a nice round num­ber and we have to start somewhere.

Now imag­ine sell­ing each paver as a per­son­al­ized item. You could sell per­son­al pavers, fam­i­ly pavers and cor­po­rate pavers and place them accord­ing­ly through­out the city. To keep things afford­able per­son­al pavers could cost $25, fam­i­ly pavers $100 and cor­po­rate pavers $250. No one could buy more than 100 pavers. That way you wouldn’t have entire streets hogged up by cor­po­rate greed.

Now let’s look at the num­bers. 300,000 per­son­al pavers sold at $25 a paver would bring in 7.5 mil­lion dol­lars. Anoth­er 100,000 fam­i­ly pavers sold at $100 would bring in an addi­tion­al 10 mil­lion. And 100,000 pavers at $250 would bring in 25 mil­lion dol­lars. All togeth­er per­son­al­ized pavers alone could bring in over 42.5 mil­lion dol­lars. Chang­ing the dis­tri­b­u­tion could make the final num­ber even larg­er, so would more pavers if I under­es­ti­mat­ed my ini­tial figures.

But wait, there’s more! What if you could sell adver­tis­ing inside the micro bus­es, on the out­side of the micro bus­es, on the microbus cards, inside the park­ing struc­ture ele­va­tors and maybe even sell the nam­ing of the struc­ture like they do with are­nas in the Unit­ed States? Don’t you think that an air­line, a cruise ship com­pa­ny (if there’s still one around) or a local bank could take the city up on the offer?

5. Actually repave Old San Juan

This is what Fortaleza Street looked like back in June, 2015, right after it was paved with poor quality materials. Notice the oil slick in the center already rearing its ugly head.

This is what For­t­aleza Street looked like back in June, 2015, right after it was paved with poor qual­i­ty mate­ri­als. Notice the oil slick in the cen­ter already rear­ing its ugly head. Click on image to see it larger.

Once again, I’m not an engi­neer, so I can’t speak of the actu­al intri­ca­cies that a project like this might entail. But one thing I do know. Once a street is repaved it would need to be closed to vehic­u­lar traf­fic PERMANENTLY. That means that a walk­a­ble Old San Juan would be a process rather than an event.  But it would need to be a process with a dead­line; not one of those that goes on for ever. A goal with­out a date is a dream.

We have all seen what repaving and reopen­ing looks like. Albeit that the most recent repaving seems to have been done with sec­ond rate mate­ri­als. But regard­less of what type of mate­ri­als were used, it’s obvi­ous that repaving streets only to reopen them to vehic­u­lar traf­fic is sheer stu­pid­i­ty. Just take a walk in Old San Juan and you’ll see what I mean.

This is the same street in June of 2018 (only three years later).

This is the same street in June of 2018 (only three years lat­er). Click on image to see it larger.

We have to get every­one on the same page and get them to under­stand that as a soci­ety we are destroy­ing one of Puer­to Rico’s great­est assets. Not to men­tion the fact that Old San Juan has tun­nels under­neath that criss­cross the city and could some­day cave under all that vehic­u­lar vibration.

6. Find your Paver… Another Way to Rake In The Cash

With the wave of cor­rup­tion that has smoth­ered gov­ern­men­tal cred­i­bil­i­ty in Puer­to Rico, it’s hard to get peo­ple to believe any­thing that our “hon­or­ables” say. Sim­ply put, in the minds of the peo­ple, if it comes from a gov­ern­ment fig­ure it must be a lie! So why not use that as an advan­tage to repave Old San Juan. Huh?

Once the repaving starts the city could invite peo­ple over to find their paver. That way they’d be sure that it’s there. Chances are that they’d bring their fam­i­lies, spend the day in the city, pay for park­ing, spend in the shops, vis­it attrac­tions and maybe even eat at a local restau­rant. It would cre­ate a syphon effect that would fun­nel dol­lars into the old city’s hurt­ing economy.

And how would we reach those peo­ple? Sim­ple!!! Direct mail. Every time a paver is sold the buy­er would pro­vide his/her name, address, phone num­ber and email. This would go into a data­base that could be used to send snail mail, email and text mes­sages. If not abused, a data­base of Old San Juan enthu­si­asts like this could be a gold mine to pro­mote oth­er events in the City as well.

Become An Honorary Puerto Rican

7. When and Where To Close The City

The city could remain open as long as the main streets lead­ing in and out were not paved. This would include streets like Norza­garay, For­t­aleza, San Fran­cis­co, Com­er­cio, Tetuán, Recin­to Sur and the water­front. Once these streets are paved the city would be per­ma­nent­ly closed to vehic­u­lar traf­fic.

Clos­ing could take place right before Fort San Cristóbal, where oncom­ing traf­fic could turn left and return through road 26. The same could be done in front of Peer 7 next to the Puer­to Rico Capi­tol build­ing.  If the repaving were extend­ed all the way to the capi­tol build­ing (which would be beau­ti­ful) traf­fic could be closed off right before the capi­tol building.

I would be the first to admit that urban plan­ning is not my thing, so these check­points could vary great­ly, but some­thing needs to be done and quick. There are plen­ty of peo­ple smarter than me on the Island so this would be a great oppor­tu­ni­ty for all those experts to chip in.

Anoth­er aspect of clos­ing down a city is what to do with all the ven­dors, sup­pli­ers and pro­fes­sion­als that need to vis­it the city peri­od­i­cal­ly. Well, why not give them elec­tron­ic per­mits that would allow them to enter the city for a cou­ple of hours hours at a time. Those that exceed the allowed time lim­it would be fined.  Cards would also need to be pro­grammed to avoid a revolv­ing door effect (that’s when you go in, out and back in for an addi­tion­al two hours).

Peo­ple that work in the city could be grant­ed spe­cial per­mits, but they would need to park in one of the many pri­vate park­ing garages.

Sim­i­lar­ly, vis­i­tors would need to com­ply with vehi­cle size and weight reg­u­la­tions. Noth­ing larg­er or heav­ier than a micro bus should be allowed inside the closed perimeter.

Absolute­ly no one would be allowed to park on the street except for deliv­ery vehi­cles. And even those would have time lim­its. Every­one else would have to use a park­ing garage or face stiff fines.

8. Using technology to close the city

Every vehi­cle enter­ing Old San Juan would need to have some kind of pass. This could be some­thing sim­i­lar to the Easy­Pass like stick­ers that are used on toll roads. That way they could be pro­grammed dif­fer­ent­ly for ven­dors, sup­pli­ers, work­ers and residents.

Ven­dors and sup­pli­ers could have a two-hour win­dow to get in and out. Exceed­ing that time would result in stiff fines that would appear on their Easy­Pass month­ly state­ment. Fail­ure to pay those fines would result in pass can­cel­la­tion and los­ing the abil­i­ty to enter the city alto­geth­er. Hack­ing the sys­tem in any way could entail stiffer fines and even jail time.

Res­i­dents would have an hour to dri­ve up to their homes, unload any gro­ceries or pack­ages, exit the city and park at the res­i­dent park­ing structure.

Mov­ing com­pa­nies and oth­er oca­sion­al vis­i­tors could be issued a tem­po­rary pass com­men­su­rate with their par­tic­u­lar needs. Every check­point would have at least one guard in charge of these spe­cial situations.

None of this is new. The tech­nol­o­gy is basi­cal­ly the same one used for toll roads, in gat­ed com­mu­ni­ties and at coun­try clubs around the world. It would just be pro­grammed differently.

Access to the city for pedes­tri­ans would be unrestricted.

9. Local and International Promotion

A walk­a­ble Old San Juan would be world­wide news. Many tourists that hate Old San Juan because of the pol­lu­tion, noise and traf­fic would glad­ly vis­it an all-new city pep­pered with side­walk cafes, chil­dren run­ning freely, peo­ple walk­ing and bik­ing on the streets and a clean­er all-around environment.

A new sense of com­mu­ni­ty would flour­ish where traf­fic jams and honk­ing horns made life mis­er­able before. Prop­er­ty prices would go sky high due to improved liv­ing and busi­ness con­di­tions. Our gov­ern­ment offi­cials could col­lect more prop­er­ty tax­es, and God knows they love that!

More events could take place where cars used to park. Nar­row streets would seem wide again. The entire city would “breath” like it hasn’t in over 100 years.

And believe me, inter­na­tion­al media would eat it all up, like they’ve tak­en notice in Madrid, Seville, Tole­do, and so many oth­er Euro­pean and Amer­i­can cities.

10. A Governing Board To Make It All Work

When I worked in the phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal sec­tor we used to joke that a camel was a horse cre­at­ed by a com­mit­tee. But in this case it would be a nec­es­sary evil. You need rep­re­sen­ta­tives from all walks of soci­ety to arrive at a meet­ing of the minds to assure that everybody’s happy.

The gov­ern­ing board for a walk­a­ble Old San Juan should be very dif­fer­ent from tra­di­tion­al gov­ern­ing boards that are usu­al­ly full of politi­cians and bureau­crats. It should be diverse and every mem­ber should have an equal voice. It should include politi­cians from the local and state gov­ern­ment, police­men, fire­men, emer­gency work­ers, busi­ness peo­ple, pro­fes­sion­als, restau­ran­teurs, hote­liers, bar own­ers, the San Juan His­toric Site (the forts), res­i­dents, media rep­re­sen­ta­tives, cler­gy, peo­ple involved in the tourism indus­try and just reg­u­lar con­cerned cit­i­zens. Any­one affect­ed should have a voice and a vote. And it should change at least every two years.

One mis­take that many Old San Juan res­i­dents make is think­ing that just because they live in the Old City it means that they own it. Well guess what? They don’t, and liv­ing there has its own chal­lenges. Old San Juan belongs to all Puer­to Ricans. That’s why we can’t con­tin­ue abus­ing it. That’s why we have to pre­serve it for our chil­dren, for our children’s chil­dren and for the rest of the world to enjoy. Just like with glob­al warm­ing and cli­mate change the time to do some­thing mean­ing­ful was YESTERDAY!!!

If it were up to me I would­n’t only repave Old San Juan, I’d demol­ish every­thing built dur­ing the 20th Cen­tu­ry along the south­east­ern quad­rant of the city, rebuild the south­ern por­tion of Fort San Cristóbal (includ­ing San­ti­a­go Gate) and put back the por­tion of the wall that went between San Cristo­bal and San Jus­to Street (includ­ing the San Justo/España gate). Of course, that’s just the dream­er in me speak­ing, but can you imag­ing what hav­ing the “only walled city in Amer­i­ca” would do for Puer­to Rico’s tourism? It would go through the roof!

How­ev­er, it’s a lit­tle late for that; about 130 years too late. I know. But it’s not too late to restore Old San Juan to its for­mer splen­dor. In fact, I don’t know of any oth­er city in Amer­i­ca (and maybe the world) (don’t quote me on that last state­ment) that is ful­ly paved in 19th Cen­tu­ry style slag pavers. That in itself would be a tremen­dous draw for tourists from every cor­ner of the globe.

Still not convinced? Watch the following video.

In my pre­vi­ous arti­cle I wrote about our nature pre­serves in the town of Cabo Rojo and how they all leave much to be desired with one notable excep­tion: the Cabo Rojo Nation­al Wildlife Refuge. Why can’t we set an exam­ple with Old San Juan? God knows that noth­ing can stop us when we put our col­lec­tive minds to it. It just seems so hard a thing to come about.

Tell your friends about this arti­cle. Let’s start a con­ver­sa­tion. I don’t claim own­er­ship for any of the ideas in expressed here. The truth of the mat­ter is that most of what I men­tion already exists some­where else. I just put them all togeth­er in a cohe­sive and easy to digest fash­ion (if you’re still with me).  I just want to repave Old San Juan and close it to vehic­u­lar traf­fic.  So all you brain­dead politi­cians out there, look­ing for bright ideas to call your own, here’s your oppor­tu­ni­ty. I’ll be more than hap­py to applaud your “for­ward think­ing”. I won’t even men­tion that I saw some­thing sim­i­lar some­where in Europe, or in the Unit­ed States, 20, 30 or even. 40 years ago. I’ll just be hap­py to final­ly see our “San Juan Peatonal”.

Orlando Mergal | Puerto Rico By GPS

©2020,Orlando Mer­gal, MA
____________________

Bilin­gual Con­tent Cre­ator, Blog­ger, Podcaster,
Author, Pho­tog­ra­ph­er and New Media Expert
Tel. 787–750-0000, Mobile 787–306-1590

connect-with-me-on-linkedin

Dis­clo­sure of Mate­r­i­al Con­nec­tion: Some of the links on this page are “affil­i­ate links.” This means that if you click on a link and pur­chase an item, I will receive an affil­i­ate com­mis­sion. Regard­less, I only rec­om­mend prod­ucts or ser­vices that I use per­son­al­ly and believe will add val­ue to my read­ers. I am dis­clos­ing this in accor­dance with the Fed­er­al Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255: “Guides Con­cern­ing the Use of Endorse­ments and Tes­ti­mo­ni­als in Advertising.”

#repave­old­san­juan #old­san­juan #ciu­dad­pa­tria #viejosan­juan #sanjuanpeatonal#prtourismcompany #prtourism #puer­tori­co #orlan­domer­gal #puer­tori­cobyg­ps #puer­tori­copho­tog­ra­phy

4 thoughts on “A Ten Step Plan To Repave Old San Juan”

  1. Hi Orlan­do, long time with­out hear­ing from you, Hap­py to see you around again, very nice arti­cle. I will sug­gest in addi­tion removed gov­er­nor from La For­t­aleza and moved his fam­i­ly to bet­ter place where secu­ri­ty forces man­aged bet­ter protests and group destruc­tions Ded­i­cate La For­t­aleza as muse­am for tourists and local citizens

    1. Actu­al­ly, hav­ing the gov­er­nor live at La For­t­aleza is a “monar­chi­cal” aber­ra­tion. I would move the gov­er­nor’s office to a more mod­ern facil­i­ty out­side the Old City and turn San­ta Catali­na Palace into a muse­um. Some peo­ple have pro­posed this in the past but politi­cians like the pomp and cir­cum­stance, the fan­cy palaces and the black cars with blink­ing lights.

  2. I guar­an­tee that at least a 25% less cars ruin­ing streets and not politi­cians around, it will make SJ walk­a­ble eas­i­er and achiev­able. It will take out destruc­tion of the city his­tor­i­cal build­ings by pro­tes­tors and crime acts.

    1. The whole thing is per­fect­ly doable. It has­n’t been done because the pow­ers at be don’t want to and don’t care about the destruc­tion going on.

Comments are closed.